Peer Reviewer Process
All manuscripts submitted to this journal undergo a peer review process to ensure academic quality, originality, relevance, and scientific contribution. The review process is conducted objectively, fairly, and confidentially by reviewers with expertise relevant to the manuscript's subject area.
The peer review process consists of the following stages:
- Initial Editorial Screening
The editor evaluates the manuscript to ensure its suitability with the journal’s focus and scope, formatting requirements, and publication ethics standards. - Plagiarism Screening
All submitted manuscripts are checked for similarity using plagiarism detection software. - Review Process
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to at least two independent reviewers who evaluate the scientific quality, methodology, analysis, originality, and contribution of the research. - Editorial Decision
Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the editor may decide to:- Accept
- Accept with Minor Revisions
- Accept with Major Revisions
- Reject
- Author Revision
Authors are required to revise their manuscripts in accordance with the reviewers’ and editors’ comments within the specified timeframe. - Final Decision
The editor evaluates the revised manuscript and makes the final publication decision.
This journal applies a Double-Blind Peer Review system, in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed from each other throughout the review process.
