Reviewers

Reviewer Board

NUANSA INFORMATIKA engages qualified peer reviewers with expertise relevant to computer science, informatics, and information technology. Reviewers are selected according to the subject matter of each manuscript. Manuscripts advancing to external review are assessed through a double-blind process involving at least two independent reviewers.

Reviewers

  1. Prof. Dr. Azham Hussain — Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.
  2. Ts. Dr. Zahian Ismail — Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.
  3. Rohaida Romli (Prof. Madya Dr.) — Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.
  4. Ts. Dr. Mohamed Ali Saip — Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.
  5. Dr. Tata Sutabri, S.Kom., MMSI., MKM — Institut Teknologi Indonesia (ITS), Indonesia.
  6. Dr. Oman Komarudin, S.Si., M.Kom. — Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia.
  7. Dr. Nur Alamsyah, M.Kom. — Universitas Informatika dan Bisnis Indonesia, Indonesia.
  8. Haodudin Nurkifli, S.T., M.Cs., Ph.D. — Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia.
  9. Taufik Ridwan, S.T., M.T. — Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia.
  10. Betha Nurina Sari, S.Kom., M.Kom. — Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia.
  11. Budiman, S.T., M.Kom. — Universitas Informatika dan Bisnis Indonesia, Indonesia.
  12. Dr. Mohamad Nurkamal Fauzan, S.T., M.T., SFPC — Universitas Logistik dan Bisnis Internasional, Indonesia.
  13. Dr. Syafrial Fachri Pane, S.T., MTI — Universitas Logistik dan Bisnis Internasional, Indonesia.
  14. Intan Purnamasari, S.Kom., M.Kom. — Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia.
  15. Sugeng Supriyadi, M.Kom. — Universitas Nurtanio, Indonesia.
  16. Fahmi Yusuf, S.Kom., MMSI., Ph.D. - Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Kuningan, Indonesia
  17. Erlan Darmawan S.Kom., M.Si, Ph.D. - Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Kuningan, Indonesia
  18. Tito Sugiharto, S.Kom, M.Eng. - Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Kuningan, Indonesia
  19. Budi Arif Darmawan, M.Kom. - Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia.

Reviewer Independence and Ethical Responsibilities

Reviewers must declare relevant financial, professional, institutional, or personal conflicts of interest; maintain manuscript confidentiality; provide timely, reasoned, and constructive assessments; and refrain from inappropriate citation requests. A person also serving as Section Editor must not act as an independent reviewer for a manuscript that the person is handling editorially. The handling editor assigns other eligible independent reviewers when a conflict exists. Confidential submissions and review reports must not be uploaded to public generative-AI services.

The editorial office periodically verifies the names, institutional affiliations, scholarly expertise, and active status of reviewers. Evidence of reviewer assignments and completed reports is retained securely in OJS and is not made public. For questions or corrections to this list, please contact [email protected].